You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘digital media’ category.

I considered posting this to the Women’s Studies course blog since it has everything to do with gender but I thought it fit our ongoing discussion about photoshopping.

I don’t even know what to say about these ads for body waxing.  On one hand, I find them awfully clever, a play on the double entendre, the slang we use for genitalia.

On the other hand, these ads tend to only enforce the ideology about grooming our genitalia.  And there is certainly an entire critical discussion that can be had about this topic.  The purpose of posting this on our blog, however, is to stir discussion about the responsibility of photoshopping our media and then actually publishing it for public consumption.   Some of it can be fun, I admit:

Though some if this image altering can certainly stir up debates concerning our ideological views on gender, class and race.  The below image prompted a lot of controversial arguments during the OJ Simpson trial:

How might making Simpson appear “darker” than he actually is help fuel our ideas about violence and African-American men?  Photoshopping has certainly helped promote our notions of sexism.  Consider this now familiar image of Sarah Palin:

Not a true photograph of Palin, yet it was a familiar image to circulate during the 2006 political campaign.  Then there is this shot that was all over the Internet directly after 9/11:

Again, not a real photograph but it certainly was a direct appeal to pathos concerning the victims of 9/11.

We have discussed how fashion photography and celebrity images have skewed how we view women—the whole Ralph Lauren issue is still in discussion for some of you.   Many of you argued against photoshopping images of women into thinner, unrealistic representations of beauty.  This image is, though contemporary, already a classic in the eating disorder online communities:

So what do you think?  Should there be a responsibility that should be recognized when altering these images with photo retouching software?  Or would creating public policy against publishing such photoshopped images only stir issues of censorship?


Nice to see women getting some acknowledgment where technology is concerned:

The 12 Most Powerful Women In Digital Media

I hit up this blog on technology on a pretty regular basis—I am pretty determined to be the first person to purchase the Apple Tablet if it is, indeed, real and not just some mythical fantasy of cyber geeks everywhere.


Can you even imagine? A giant iPhone! Apple’s cooler version of the netbook. And I am just the consumer to buy one: my iPhone is the only thing that I have in my hands almost at all times. I have left the house without my wallet, my jacket, even my keys. But I always have my iPhone. My entire existence is on there. It is an extension of my self, merging me with technology in ways I never would have imagined. Which makes me question: Am I a cyborg?

According the semi-reliable Wikipedia, a cyborg is a “an organism that has both artificial and natural systems.” Oh yeah. That is so me. If I could have the iPhone/iTouch technology embedded into my arm, I would do it. It would be one less thing to carry.

In reality, just carrying my iPhone with me everywhere I go does not make me a cyborg in any form. But git a load of this:


I mean, how cool is this?!

This picture totally took my breath away when I saw it. I can’t even walk across campus without getting winded and this chick is running marathons on cyber legs. That is impressive enough; add in that she had to learn to walk on these legs makes my adoration grow even more so.

The use of new technologies in the medical field is baffling. When I was younger, any chicken pox outbreak was a call for old school play dates; mothers thrust their kids into infected communities to get the illness over with.

And you thought South Park came up with this!


My mother did this: with four of us at home, she wanted us all exposed at the same time and that is exactly what happened, from my oldest brother on down to me we scratched our way through the pox outbreak until we passed it onto other kids in the neighborhood. Imagine my awe at knowing there is a vaccination for chicken pox now, something most of you probably got as a baby. You all miss that childhood rite of passage.

From vaccinations to the cure for cancer new technology has made its presence felt. Of course, this technology also brings with it ethical issues related to cloning and bioterrorism. But just glancing at the above shot of Aimee Mullins offers some insight into the benefits of such advances in new technology.

Illness, ailment, disability…you have been p0wn3d.

Audience is a pretty big deal in writing. We have been talking about it all semester, how audience makes all the difference in composing a text—who is reading, who is taking action. As we are about to step into the Argument Project, it got me thinking about the power of audience and how technology has helped create new audiences that might not normally be there.

I have a series of videos here, the original song and the remake. Watch them. But most importantly, give them a listen. Consider how audience changes, depending on the text. Listen to the beat of the music, the vocal arrangement, the switch in genre. What’s the context? Did it change for each song? Did the voice and tone change the meaning? How might audience change the purpose of the text? Go on. Give them all a listen. I dare you.

Eurythmics, “Sweet Dreams (Are Made Of This)”
I was a big fan of the Eurythmics in the 80s. How could I not be? Powerful female with an ultra-feminine voice yet so very, very androgynous.

Marilyn Manson, “Sweet Dreams (Are Made Of This)”
Ah, Marilyn. Tried to be as powerfully androgynous as Annie but never quite pulling it off. But not a bad version. Enough for me to see him perform this in concert. Really.

Depeche Mode, “Personal Jesus”
Oddly, I could only find live versions of this song, all mellowed out acoustically. But this is the original song, a fantastic song…

Johnny Cash, “Personal Jesus”
Until The Man in Black did a cover. Fantabulous.

There is huge popularity in redoing hip-hop songs. Not certain if it’s because of the content or the opportunity to rework the beats. Perhaps both. Why do you think?

Jay Z, “Hard Knock Life”
Love, love, love the beats. I am guessing many of you have never heard the original song Jay Z sampled. You must watch it below.

Annie, “It’s A Hard Knock Life”
Originally a Broadway show with many, many now famous Annie’s (Sarah Jessica Parker, for one). This video is from the film. Chose to post this version because the choreography is just way too much fun.

Dr. Dre, “Bitches Ain’t Shit”
Yeah, I hated it when I first heard it. The lyrics got my feminist ruffles up. They are rough for my 42 yr old ears. No original video on this one so you’ll have to settle with just a listen.

Ben Folds, “Bitches Ain’t Shit”
And then I heard this version. And what do you know? A perfect example of how audience can change if the text is composed differently. Love it. Actually made me go back to the original and learn to appreciate the rhymes. Really.

Michael Jackson, “Smooth Criminal”
I’m honestly not a Michael Jackson fan but I do like some of his stuff. This is one of his I really, really like.

Alien Ant Farm, “Smooth Criminal”
And I REALLY, REALLY like this. But then, I like my music a bit on the loud side.

Black Eyed Peas, “My Humps”
For the record, let’s just establish that Fergie can do no wrong in my eyes.

Alanis Morissette, “My Humps”
Rumor has it that Fergie sent Alanis flowers after seeing this vid on YouTube. I believe it. She is just that cool.

Nelly, “Hot In Herre”
This song is pretty good. Like anything of Miley’s and Britney’s, it stirs my earworm every time I hear it.

Jenny Owen Youngs, “Hot In Herre”
But, omg. This pushes me over the edge. I love this chick. I will follow her to the moon.

just to add to our fantastic discussion last week about photoshopped images. This was actually published in magazines this month:


According to Ralph Lauren:

“For over 42 years we have built a brand based on quality and integrity. After further investigation, we have learned that we are responsible for the poor imaging and retouching that resulted in a very distorted image of a woman’s body. We have addressed the problem and going forward will take every precaution to ensure that the caliber of our artwork represents our brand appropriately.”


Apparently, the model for this ad has been fired by Ralph Lauren. For being too big.


oh, Ralph Lauren is not having a good week. This ad was just found. Seems the fashion line has made this photoshopping thing a habit:


Because of this:

So I am hanging in Toronto this weekend to visit a friend. She is one of my closest friends—we have known each other for over a decade. Oddly, we met over the Internet. She’s an actor; I visited her fan website for a school assignment and in time, a friendship grew out of our cyber-interaction.

I met quite a few people from this same online community and we have all become very close friends. Not only have we continued our friendships online throughout the years but we have also met offline in several forms, one gathering during a weekend of debauchery in Vegas.

It’s been exciting having these relationships, as we are all so different. While several of us are from the states, there is a woman from South America, one from Australia and quite a few Europeans.

I like that the Internet has helped encourage such diversity by way of relationships. I don’t know that I would have had the opportunity to do some of the things I have done and I certainly would not have met some of the fantastic people I have met if it weren’t for online opportunities.


We tend to have an image in our minds of people that interact online are all gamers, mostly male, hiding in their basement amongst bags of cheetos and cans of Dr. Pepper.



(This certainly does not define me; I am not a gamer, nor do I even like Dr. Pepper. Though I have had a cheeto or several in my lifetime.)

Where might this stereotype come from? At what point in our collective ideology was the Internet user constructed as anti-social?


I open this post with an anecdote about the relationships I have formed to offer an example of how I believe cyberspace actually helps encourage social interaction among people, not limit it. It opens our world to a much bigger space and often helps us understand diversity with the vast access to people different from us, outside our geophysical neighborhoods.

So what do you think? Do you think the Internet has made us socially awkward, as many scholars will argue? Have you met people and formed relationships online with people that you have never met in “real life”? What might the implication be to limit our space to only physical interactions?

I tend to get wrapped up in late night Internet surfing. One of my distractions this past summer was pranks. You cannot believe how many people do nasty, vindictive things to their roommates, family members or significant others and then upload them to YouTube for all to see. And you cannot believe how funny I find them.

I feel bad, just a bit bad, about how much I love watching these pranks. Because for the most part, they are dangerous and people get hurt.

But wow, are these people clever!

It makes me wonder how many of these pranks would exist if it weren’t for the possibility of venues such as YouTube. I mean, I am sure that people have pulling pranks on each other for centuries but how much does a user-friendly digital platform encourage people to do really stupid things to each other?

Dove – Evolution

iWanex Studio, Photo Retouching

Sexism, Strength and Dominance: Masculinity in Disney Films

This was my first record player.


It was from Fisher-Price and it played pre-formatted plastic “records” that sounded like tin. I loved it. The sound didn’t bother me as I had the freedom to play my music (all children’s nursery rhymes) when I wanted to hear it.

My mother bought me a real record player a few years later at a garage sale. This is the first album I ever bought:


OK. Stop laughing. I was 10. Disco—and this movie—was hugely popular at the time. I must have listened to that album a million times. Though I have to admit, with older siblings, my tastes quickly moved from The Bee Gees and into more sophisticated music:


This is the first CD I ever bought:


It was 1989 and I remember it very clearly. I eagerly anticipated the release of this CD, having been a Kate Bush fan through much of high school. At the time, music was still easily available to purchase in album form and indeed, I had the album Hounds of Love, her 1985 release.


While I can remember my first album and CD, I cannot, for the life of me, remember my first cassette tape. Which is odd since I was in high school in the 80s which means that overall, I did most of my music listening on this:


I note the historical ride through my instruments of music listening because now, I listen to music on this:


And this:


(OK, I admit that my MacBook is not nearly as new as this one but I am thinking Field of Dreams here: “If you build it, they will come.” If I post a pic of a new MacBook Pro, perhaps one will miraculously arrive on my desk overnight.)

As my listening pleasure has become a digital event, I realize that it is time to do something about the 7 boxes of unpacked CDs that have been sitting on my office floor since I moved here a year ago. Most of them are already ripped to my hard drive but I expect that once I actually open these boxes, I will find CDs I completely forgot about and it will feel as if I have a whole mess of new music.

I have prolonged this transfer of technology, however, because I think it will be very much like the way I felt when I made the leap from cassette to CD: as much as I loved the streamline of the CD and the larger format to read things such as liner notes and lyrics, there was something about that click of the cassette case, the smell of the tape, the need of the pencil to rewind the loose cartridge that I was going to miss.

And once I make that transfer away from CDs completely, I only have the digital version of “album art” which is small and not nearly as interesting as it was in the past. I am certainly a true believer in the betterment of our lives with new technologies and I support digital music otherwise I would not interact with it. But I will be melancholy when I sell those old CDs to a used CD store, especially Kate Bush’s The Sensual World. Just memories of the week I bought it and played it non-stop are special to my young adulthood.

What technology have you given up to move into newer forms? Are you sad to see it go?